Contingent Control and Wild Moments: Conducting Psychiatric Evaluations in the Home
When social control and social service workers go into the field, into the "native habitat" of some problem, a variety of tacit structures and controls that mark office work with its standardized documents and formal meetings are weakened or absent entirely. As a result, compared to office...
Published in: | Social Inclusion |
---|---|
Authors: | ; |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cogitatio Press
2019
|
In: |
Social Inclusion
|
Further subjects: | B
frontline decision-making
B clientization B Social Control B Home visits B field psychiatry |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | When social control and social service workers go into the field, into the "native habitat" of some problem, a variety of tacit structures and controls that mark office work with its standardized documents and formal meetings are weakened or absent entirely. As a result, compared to office settings, social control work in field settings tends to become open, contingent, unpredictable, and on occasion even wild. This article provides a strategic case study of the distinctive features of social control decision-making in the field, drawing on observations of field work by psychiatric emergency teams (PET) from the 1970s. PET typically went to the homes of psychiatrically-troubled persons in order to conduct evaluations for involuntary mental hospitalization. This article will analyze the varied, situationally-sensitive practices these workers adopted to evaluate such patients in their own homes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2183-2803 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Social Inclusion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17645/si.v7i1.1788 |