The use of “shark repellents” to prevent corporate takeovers: An ethical perspective

Certain types of corporate charter antitakeover amendments, or “shark repellents,” may not serve the interests of the stockholders or the stakeholders of the firm. This paper extends the examination of the use of shark repellents by taking an ethical perspective to synthesize prior research on shark...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Meade, Nancy L. (Author) ; Davidson, Dan (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 1993
Em: Journal of business ethics
Ano: 1993, Volume: 12, Número: 2, Páginas: 83-92
Outras palavras-chave:B Ethical Perspective
B Interest Group
B Expense
B Corporate Takeover
B Economic Growth
Acesso em linha: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Certain types of corporate charter antitakeover amendments, or “shark repellents,” may not serve the interests of the stockholders or the stakeholders of the firm. This paper extends the examination of the use of shark repellents by taking an ethical perspective to synthesize prior research on shark repellents and their relationship to stockholder and stakeholder welfare. Some shark repellents seem to benefit certain interest groups at the expense of other groups.
ISSN:1573-0697
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/BF00871928