The use of “shark repellents” to prevent corporate takeovers: An ethical perspective
Certain types of corporate charter antitakeover amendments, or “shark repellents,” may not serve the interests of the stockholders or the stakeholders of the firm. This paper extends the examination of the use of shark repellents by taking an ethical perspective to synthesize prior research on shark...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1993
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1993, Volume: 12, Issue: 2, Pages: 83-92 |
Further subjects: | B
Ethical Perspective
B Interest Group B Expense B Corporate Takeover B Economic Growth |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Certain types of corporate charter antitakeover amendments, or “shark repellents,” may not serve the interests of the stockholders or the stakeholders of the firm. This paper extends the examination of the use of shark repellents by taking an ethical perspective to synthesize prior research on shark repellents and their relationship to stockholder and stakeholder welfare. Some shark repellents seem to benefit certain interest groups at the expense of other groups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00871928 |