Cognitive Regeneration and the Noetic Effects of Sin: Why Theology and Cognitive Science May not be Compatible

Justin Barrett and Kelly James Clark have suggested that cognitive science of religion supports the existence of a god-faculty akin to sensus divinitatis. They propose that God may have given rise to the god-faculty via guided evolution. This suggestion raises two theological worries. First, our nat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Launonen, Lari (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham 2021
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Jahr: 2021, Band: 13, Heft: 3, Seiten: 113-137
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Gotteslehre / Sünde / Noetik / Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
IxTheo Notationen:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
AE Religionspsychologie
NBC Gotteslehre
weitere Schlagwörter:B noetic effects of sin
B evolution of religion
B Prejudice
B cognitive science of religion
B Reformed Epistemology
B Sensus Divinitatis
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (doi)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Justin Barrett and Kelly James Clark have suggested that cognitive science of religion supports the existence of a god-faculty akin to sensus divinitatis. They propose that God may have given rise to the god-faculty via guided evolution. This suggestion raises two theological worries. First, our natural cognition seems to favor false god-beliefs over true ones. Second, it also makes us prone to tribalism. If God hates idolatry and moral evil, why would he give rise to mind with such biases? A Plantingian response would point to the noetic effects of sin. Such a response, however, would have to assume that God is restoring the minds of believers. This paper considers empirical reasons to doubt that such a process is taking place.
Enthält:Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.2021.3398