‘God’ in Public Reason
The recent suicide bombings in London by young Islamists should remind Christian theologians that they are committed to a liberal polity of some kind. But is a genuinely theological liberalism possible? Many still think that public reason in a liberal polity must be universally accessible and theref...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2006
|
| In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2006, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 9-19 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1776581423 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211110043336.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211110s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0953946806062266 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1776581423 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1776581423 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Biggar, Nigel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘God’ in Public Reason |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The recent suicide bombings in London by young Islamists should remind Christian theologians that they are committed to a liberal polity of some kind. But is a genuinely theological liberalism possible? Many still think that public reason in a liberal polity must be universally accessible and therefore ‘secular’; and that it requires those with religious convictions to strip their public speech of theology. Such is the position taken by Jürgen Habermas in a recent newspaper interview. But is Habermas correct to suppose that a theological argument must be inaccessible to ‘non-theologians’? This essay returns a negative answer by seeking to demonstrate that a genuinely theological argument — for example, about the legalisation of euthanasia — can be grasped by non-theologians, can engage them, and might even persuade them. It concludes that on this point the late John Rawls has certain advantages over that of Habermas. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in Christian ethics |d London : Sage, 1988 |g 19(2006), 1, Seite 9-19 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)368910555 |w (DE-600)2118000-3 |w (DE-576)11946067X |x 0953-9468 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2006 |g number:1 |g pages:9-19 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946806062266 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 19 |j 2006 |e 1 |h 9-19 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4000487876 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1776581423 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211110043336 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-06#9CC754226DAFE5183A0A6380CAE7BE762BEF2D10 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||