Religion and Public Reason: An Epistemological Interpretation
Using Audi's argument for secular public debate as a starting point, which argues for the exclusion of religion from individuals' public political discourse, this paper argues that it is a fundamental obligation of all citizens in a pluralistic liberal democracy to adhere to a notion of p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
AASR
[2009]
|
| In: |
Australian religion studies review
Year: 2009, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 64-82 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | Using Audi's argument for secular public debate as a starting point, which argues for the exclusion of religion from individuals' public political discourse, this paper argues that it is a fundamental obligation of all citizens in a pluralistic liberal democracy to adhere to a notion of public reason'. It does not, however accept Audi and Rawls' interpretations of the notion of public reason uncritically. Through a comparative study of both philosophers' principles, a new interpretation of the notion is put forward which focuses on epistemic sources as the crucial criteria for deciding what counts as public reason. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1744-9014 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Australian religion studies review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/arsr.v22i1.64 |