Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo: A Response to Joseph Hannon’s “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation”
Joseph Hannon has expressed a most surprising objection to Aquinas scholar Prof William E. Carroll in his latest paper “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation.” The main claim is that Prof. Carroll misunderstands Aquinas' doctrine of creatio ex nihilo by reducing...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2021
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2021, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 91-99 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science FA Theology KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages NBD Doctrine of Creation |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Joseph Hannon has expressed a most surprising objection to Aquinas scholar Prof William E. Carroll in his latest paper “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation.” The main claim is that Prof. Carroll misunderstands Aquinas' doctrine of creatio ex nihilo by reducing it to a metaphysical notion, rather than considering it in its full theological sense. In this paper I show Hannon's misinterpretation of Carroll's and Thomas Aquinas' thought, particularly by stressing the dependence that the doctrine of providence through secondary causes has on the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation (2020)"
Kritik in "A Response to Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo by Ignacio Silva (2021)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2021.1910908 |