Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo: A Response to Joseph Hannon’s “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation”
Joseph Hannon has expressed a most surprising objection to Aquinas scholar Prof William E. Carroll in his latest paper “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation.” The main claim is that Prof. Carroll misunderstands Aquinas' doctrine of creatio ex nihilo by reducing...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2021
|
In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2021, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 91-99 |
IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science FA Theology KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages NBD Doctrine of Creation |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Joseph Hannon has expressed a most surprising objection to Aquinas scholar Prof William E. Carroll in his latest paper “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation.” The main claim is that Prof. Carroll misunderstands Aquinas' doctrine of creatio ex nihilo by reducing it to a metaphysical notion, rather than considering it in its full theological sense. In this paper I show Hannon's misinterpretation of Carroll's and Thomas Aquinas' thought, particularly by stressing the dependence that the doctrine of providence through secondary causes has on the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation (2020)"
Kritik in "A Response to Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo by Ignacio Silva (2021)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2021.1910908 |