Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation
It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justifie...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2020, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 290-302 |
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages NBC Doctrine of God NBD Doctrine of Creation VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
theistic naturalism
B Origins B Creation B Aquinas B Metaphysics B Causality |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justified this position, citing arguments made by Thomas, specifically that creation does not involve change. Here, I argue that this is a major distortion of Aquinas’ views and that the ontology of creation formulated is fundamentally incoherent. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo: A Response to Joseph Hannon’s “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation” (2021)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2020.1755545 |