"Divided against itself"?: individual maxims and the redaction of Q

In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta theologica
Main Author: Howes, Llewellyn 1980- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 2015
In: Acta theologica
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Q / Prophecy / Wisdom / Bible. Lukasevangelium 7,35 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,17-18,20 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,21-22 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,23 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,24-26 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,33 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,34-35 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 12,54-55 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 12,58-59 / Bible. Lukasevangelium 17,37
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process. It also explores the possibility that the main redactor not only inserted and interpolated prophetic material into Q¹, but also transformed original wisdom sayings into prophetic Q² material.
ISSN:2309-9089
Contains:Enthalten in: Acta theologica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.4314/actat.v35i1.6
HDL: 10520/EJC172468