"Divided against itself"?: individual maxims and the redaction of Q
In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2015
|
In: |
Acta theologica
Year: 2015, Volume: 35, Issue: 1, Pages: 96-114 |
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
Further subjects: | B
Bible. Lukasevangelium 12,58-59
B Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,17-18,20 B Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,34-35 B Bible. Lukasevangelium 12,54-55 B Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,23 B Q B Wisdom B Bible. Lukasevangelium 17,37 B Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,33 B Bible. Lukasevangelium 7,35 B Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,21-22 B Bible. Lukasevangelium 11,24-26 B Prophecy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process. It also explores the possibility that the main redactor not only inserted and interpolated prophetic material into Q¹, but also transformed original wisdom sayings into prophetic Q² material. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1015-8758 |
Contains: | In: Acta theologica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.4314/actat.v35i1.6 |