A Temporal First Cause?: Reply to Craig's Reply
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig's theistic account of the origin of the universe implies that at the first moment of time, t1, God is both timeless and temporal, a contradiction (Wielenberg 2021). Craig responded to that argument; I here reply to Craig's resp...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
[2021]
|
| Dans: |
TheoLogica
Année: 2021, Volume: 5, Numéro: 1, Pages: 93-96 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | NBC Dieu VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Timeless God
B William Craig B Cosmological Argument B Kalâm B agent causation |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig's theistic account of the origin of the universe implies that at the first moment of time, t1, God is both timeless and temporal, a contradiction (Wielenberg 2021). Craig responded to that argument; I here reply to Craig's response. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "No Trouble (2021)"
Kritik in "A Reply to Wielenberg on a Timeless First Cause (2021)" |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i1.60283 |