Loke on the Infinite God Objection
In a recent article, Andrew Ter Ern Loke raises several objections to Jacobus Erasmus and Anné Hendrik Verhoef's exposition and response to the so-called 'Infinite God Objection' to the kalām cosmological argument. According to this objection, the argument against the possibility of...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2018]
|
| En: |
Sophia
Año: 2018, Volumen: 57, Número: 1, Páginas: 151-156 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión NBC Dios |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Omniscience
B Kalām cosmological argument B Infinite God objection B Abstract objects |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Publisher) |
| Sumario: | In a recent article, Andrew Ter Ern Loke raises several objections to Jacobus Erasmus and Anné Hendrik Verhoef's exposition and response to the so-called 'Infinite God Objection' to the kalām cosmological argument. According to this objection, the argument against the possibility of an actual infinite brings into question the view that God's knowledge is infinite. Erasmus and Verhoef's solution to this objection, which Loke criticises, depends on an unusual account of omniscience. In this article, I respond to Loke and show that his objections are unsuccessful. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "On the Infinite God Objection (2016)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-017-0606-9 |
