Afterword: Multiplicities and Intersections of Homes and Fields

Multiple and context-specific terms for "home" in Indian languages can help us as ethnographers imagine and recognize home(s) and field(s) as non-binary, multiple, fluid, intersecting categories. In North India, these terms may include: mulnivas, gaon, ghar, maika (pihar), sasural. The te...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Special Issue: Shifting Sites, Shifting Selves: The Intersections of Homes and Fields in the Ethnography of India
Main Author: Flueckiger, Joyce Burkhalter 1952- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Equinox [2020]
In: Fieldwork in religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 15, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 180-192
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B India / Field-research / Woman religious studies scholar / Self-image / Intersubjectivity / Intersectionality / Home / Strangeness
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
KBM Asia
ZB Sociology
Further subjects:B Field
B Uttarakhand
B Belonging
B Landour
B Mussoorie
B Stevens, John C.: Home
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Multiple and context-specific terms for "home" in Indian languages can help us as ethnographers imagine and recognize home(s) and field(s) as non-binary, multiple, fluid, intersecting categories. In North India, these terms may include: mulnivas, gaon, ghar, maika (pihar), sasural. The terms identify home by ancestry, residence, performance and ritual, affect, landscapes, and familial and other relationships. Paying attention to the everyday use of indigenous terms, we also learn that home may be gendered and may change over a person's life cycle. While concepts of belonging and home are fluid and multiple, they may also have limits and constraints. Individuals in our research communities, families, academic audiences - and we as ethnographers - all have the potential to belong or lose belonging, even to renounce belonging, in multiple ways that shift over time and in different contexts. One of our tasks as ethnographers is to recognize these possibilities and to write in ways that leave space for their fluidity.
ISSN:1743-0623
Contains:Enthalten in: Fieldwork in religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/firn.18359