Ambiguities of Prophecy: Old Testament Rhetoric in the American Founding Era
Scholars have long recognized the impact of Hebrew prophecy on the rhetoric of the American Founding era, but they have assumed it is all of one type, the American Jeremiad, a clarion call for political action. In fact, biblical rhetoric during this era mirrors three types of Old Testament prophecy...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
| En: |
Politics and religion
Año: 2020, Volumen: 13, Número: 3, Páginas: 575-603 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
USA
/ Bibel. Jeremia
/ Profecía
/ Protestantismo
/ Retórica
/ Excepcionalismo norteamericano
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | CG Cristianismo y política HB Antiguo Testamento KBQ América del Norte ZC Política general |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electrónico
|
| Sumario: | Scholars have long recognized the impact of Hebrew prophecy on the rhetoric of the American Founding era, but they have assumed it is all of one type, the American Jeremiad, a clarion call for political action. In fact, biblical rhetoric during this era mirrors three types of Old Testament prophecy formulated at three distinct moments in ancient Biblical history: before, during, and after the Babylonian Exile of 587 BCE. I refer to these as repentance, Jeremiad, and disappointment. I interpret sermons by three leading Protestant ministers in order to demonstrate that all three types of Hebraic prophecy were prevalent during this era, but only one of them, the Jeremiad, seeks to inspire political action; second, the Jeremiad was prominent only during the Revolutionary War. Before the war, and after the ratification of the Constitution, the two quietistic modes of prophecy, repentance, and disappointment, are more prevalent. I conclude by speculating about what the American founders might think of the contemporary rhetorical landscape, where the Jeremiad has become dominant, drowning out more moderate forms of biblical discourse. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1755-0491 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Politics and religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S1755048320000024 |