Trauma, place, and transformation
This commentary comprises three different responses to Counted and Zock’s article: “Place Spirituality: An Attachment Perspective.” The first response is from Esther Sternberg, MD, who gives a psychophysiological and neuroscience critique. The second is from Altaf Engineer, PhD, from the perspective...
Authors: | ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
[2019]
|
In: |
Archive for the psychology of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 41, Issue: 1, Pages: 26-32 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Trauma
/ Place
/ Neurosciences
|
IxTheo Classification: | AE Psychology of religion AF Geography of religion AG Religious life; material religion |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This commentary comprises three different responses to Counted and Zock’s article: “Place Spirituality: An Attachment Perspective.” The first response is from Esther Sternberg, MD, who gives a psychophysiological and neuroscience critique. The second is from Altaf Engineer, PhD, from the perspective of architecture and environmental psychology, and the last response is from Hester Oberman, PhD, who gives a psychology of religion rebuttal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-6121 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Archive for the psychology of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0084672418824067 |