Supporting the best charities is harder than it seems
Once upon a time, I attempted to create a web-based one-stop-shop for global poverty relief called the Maximin Project. Drawing on aspects of that experience, I show that although some existing ways of rating and recommending charities are significantly better than others, there remain certain chall...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2016]
|
In: |
Journal of global ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 12, Issue: 2, Pages: 240-244 |
Further subjects: | B
Poverty
B Giving B Virtue B Altruism B Charity |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Summary: | Once upon a time, I attempted to create a web-based one-stop-shop for global poverty relief called the Maximin Project. Drawing on aspects of that experience, I show that although some existing ways of rating and recommending charities are significantly better than others, there remain certain challenges that need to be overcome. Specifically, I argue that the emerging Effective Altruism movement, with its emphasis on measurable effectiveness, runs the risk of neglecting a whole range of projects that are necessary for a well-rounded approach to human development. I briefly model an alternative virtue-based approach that calls on the personal insight of individual researchers and practitioners in addition to the more directly experimental approach of organizations like GiveWell. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1744-9634 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of global ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2016.1205118 |