Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: A Reply to Mark Edwards
In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2020]
|
| В: |
TheoLogica
Год: 2020, Том: 4, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 87-101 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | NBC Бог NBF Христология |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Subordination
B Analytic Theology B Trinity B Eternal Generation |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father. |
|---|---|
| Объем: | 15 |
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Is Subordinationism a Heresy? (2020)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323 |