Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: A Reply to Mark Edwards
In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider...
| Published in: | TheoLogica |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
[2020]
|
| In: |
TheoLogica
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
Subordination
B Analytic Theology B Trinity B Eternal Generation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Is Subordinationism a Heresy? (2020)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323 |