Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: A Reply to Mark Edwards
In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Έκδοση: |
[2020]
|
Στο/Στη: |
TheoLogica
Έτος: 2020, Τόμος: 4, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 87-101 |
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | NBC Δόγμα του Θεού NBF Χριστολογία |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Subordination
B Analytic Theology B Trinity B Eternal Generation |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Σύνοψη: | In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father. |
---|---|
Φυσική περιγραφή: | 15 |
ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
Αναφορά: | Kritik von "Is Subordinationism a Heresy? (2020)"
|
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323 |