Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: A Reply to Mark Edwards
In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Beteiligte: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
TheoLogica
Jahr: 2020, Band: 4, Heft: 2, Seiten: 87-101 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | NBC Gotteslehre NBF Christologie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Subordination
B Analytic Theology B Trinity B Eternal Generation |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father. |
|---|---|
| Physische Details: | 15 |
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "Is Subordinationism a Heresy? (2020)"
|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323 |