Religion and Public Reason: An Epistemological Interpretation
Using Audi's argument for secular public debate as a starting point, which argues for the exclusion of religion from individuals' public political discourse, this paper argues that it is a fundamental obligation of all citizens in a pluralistic liberal democracy to adhere to a notion of p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
AASR
[2009]
|
| In: |
Australian religion studies review
Year: 2009, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 64-82 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1693854546 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200402162344.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200402s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/arsr.v22i1.64 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1693854546 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1693854546 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a De Vietri, Raphaël |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religion and Public Reason |b An Epistemological Interpretation |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2009] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Using Audi's argument for secular public debate as a starting point, which argues for the exclusion of religion from individuals' public political discourse, this paper argues that it is a fundamental obligation of all citizens in a pluralistic liberal democracy to adhere to a notion of public reason'. It does not, however accept Audi and Rawls' interpretations of the notion of public reason uncritically. Through a comparative study of both philosophers' principles, a new interpretation of the notion is put forward which focuses on epistemic sources as the crucial criteria for deciding what counts as public reason. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a Interpretation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Australian religion studies review |d St. Lucia, Qld : AASR, 2005 |g 22(2009), 1, Seite 64-82 |w (DE-627)513219749 |w (DE-600)2238779-1 |w (DE-576)255268017 |x 1744-9014 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2009 |g number:1 |g pages:64-82 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1846008743 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.equinoxjournals.com/ojs/index.php/ARSR/article/view/4730 |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/arsr.v22i1.64 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 22 |j 2009 |e 1 |h 64-82 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3617739067 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1693854546 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200402162344 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200402||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||