Replies to Commentators
Replies are given to comments, questions, and objections to The Appearance of Ignorance. The reply to Robin McKenna focuses mainly on his questions of whether, with the skeptical argument I'm focused on, a strong enough appearance of ignorance is generated to require an account of that appearan...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2020]
|
| En: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Año: 2020, Volumen: 10, Número: 1, Páginas: 68-104 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Contextualismo epistemológico
/ Epistemología
/ Escepticismo
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión VA Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
epistemic conservatism
B counterexamples B Lotteries B Safety B sensitivity B Skepticism |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | Replies are given to comments, questions, and objections to The Appearance of Ignorance. The reply to Robin McKenna focuses mainly on his questions of whether, with the skeptical argument I'm focused on, a strong enough appearance of ignorance is generated to require an account of that appearance, and whether, to the extent that we do need to account for that appearance, we might do so without contextualism by adopting a solution proposed by Ernest Sosa. The reply to Michael Blome-Tillman focuses mainly on a counterexample he offers to my account of the operation of the "Rule of Sensitivity." The reply to Elke Brendel focuses mainly on objections to contextualism from the phenomena of disagreement and retraction. The reply to Peter Baumann concerns several of his comments about my treatment of the Harman lottery puzzle. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "DeRose on Lotteries (2020)"
Kritik von "Disagreeing with a Skeptic from a Contextualist Point of View (2020)" Kritik von "What Shifts Epistemic Standards? DeRose on Contextualism, Safety, and Sensitivity (2020)" Kritik von "The Disappearance of Ignorance (2020)" |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22105700-20191401 |
