What Shifts Epistemic Standards? DeRose on Contextualism, Safety, and Sensitivity
In The Appearance of Ignorance, Keith DeRose develops a version of epistemic contextualism that combines aspects of both safety and sensitivity theories of knowledge. This paper discusses some potential problems for DeRose's account stemming from his Rule of Sensitivity, which is meant to model...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2020, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-27 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Epistemological contextualism
/ Cognition theory
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
epistemic standards
B Book review B Keith DeRose B Safety B sensitivity B epistemic contextualism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | In The Appearance of Ignorance, Keith DeRose develops a version of epistemic contextualism that combines aspects of both safety and sensitivity theories of knowledge. This paper discusses some potential problems for DeRose's account stemming from his Rule of Sensitivity, which is meant to model upwards shifts in epistemic standards. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Replies to Commentators (2020)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22105700-20191370 |