Dating Papyri: Familiarity, Instinct and Guesswork

This article surveys the history of palaeographical dating of papyri, reflecting on its origins as a system, and what lessons this might have for contemporary practice. In examining the beginnings of palaeography as a discipline in the late seventeenth century with the work of scholars such as Jean...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Choat, Malcolm (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage [2019]
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2019, Volume: 42, Issue: 1, Pages: 58-83
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Mabillon, Jean 1632-1707 / Hamon, Pierre -1569 / Papyrus / Paleography / Dating / History 1561-1704
IxTheo Classification:HH Archaeology
KAA Church history
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
Further subjects:B Authenticity
B Pierre Hamon
B Jean Mabillon
B Palaeography
B Dating
B Papyri
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article surveys the history of palaeographical dating of papyri, reflecting on its origins as a system, and what lessons this might have for contemporary practice. In examining the beginnings of palaeography as a discipline in the late seventeenth century with the work of scholars such as Jean Mabillon, it highlights the concerns of that period, especially the authenticity of documents. In this context, palaeographical dating was only one (though of course an important component) of a range of tools scholars used to date and authenticate texts. In the same way, contemporary scholars use an array of methods to date the texts they study, including script, language, content, and the physical properties of the ink and its support. This article highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of each of these methods, whether caused by their subjective nature or the current limits of scientific knowledge, and emphasizes one of the key lessons of Mabillon's practice, the broad familiarity with many types of script and manuscript which allow these to be properly contextualized and understood.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X19855580