Sexual difference, gender, and agency in Karl Barth's Church dogmatics

This volume is a critical and constructive analysis of the sexually differentiated self in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatic. It secures in his Christocentric pattern of human agency an untapped resource for unsettling and reimagining the heteropatriarchal structure of human fellowship at the heart...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Bodley-Dangelo, Faye (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Livre
Langue:Anglais
Service de livraison Subito: Commander maintenant.
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: London New York Oxford New Delhi Sydney International Clark 2020
Dans:Année: 2020
Collection/Revue:T&T Clark explorations in reformed theology
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Barth, Karl 1886-1968 / Théologie / Éthique sexuelle / Différences de genre / Barth, Karl 1886-1968, Die kirchliche Dogmatik / Sexualité / Différences de genre
Classifications IxTheo:NBA Théologie dogmatique
NBE Anthropologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Sex Religious aspects Christianity
B Theology, Doctrinal
B Barth, Karl (1886-1968) Kirchliche Dogmatik
B Theological Anthropology Christianity
Description
Résumé:This volume is a critical and constructive analysis of the sexually differentiated self in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatic. It secures in his Christocentric pattern of human agency an untapped resource for unsettling and reimagining the heteropatriarchal structure of human fellowship at the heart of his theological anthropology. Moving through Barth's doctrines of revelation, creation, theological anthropology, and special ethics, Faye Bodley-Dangelo locates the human agent in his broader project aimed at re-habilitating the subject of modern protestant theology. She argues the human actor comes into view as the recipient of Christ's redemptive activity, which redirects it out of self-aggrandizing isolation and into relationships of dependency, responsiveness, and ethical responsibility to multiple sites of divine and creaturely alterity. The book debates that Barth's model of human agency cannot on its own terms sustain his version of female subordination nor his repudiation of same-sex relationships. Rather, it contains ethically-oriented, critical and reflective mechanisms that resist the sexist heterosexist dimension of his theological anthropology and lend themselves to an anti-essentialist performative account of gender.
Description:Literaturverzeichnis: 182-190
ISBN:0567679306