The X-claim argument against religious belief offers nothing new
Stephen Law has recently offered an argument against the rationality of certain religious beliefs that he calls the X-claim argument against religious beliefs (Law in Relig Stud, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412526000330). The argument purports to show that it is irrational to believe in the e...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2018]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 84, Issue: 2, Pages: 223-232 |
| Further subjects: | B
Unreliable sources
B Religious Diversity B X-claim B Religious Belief B Defeat |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1663420025 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200527121116.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190418s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-018-9658-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1663420025 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1663420025 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a McBrayer, Justin |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The X-claim argument against religious belief offers nothing new |c Justin McBrayer |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Stephen Law has recently offered an argument against the rationality of certain religious beliefs that he calls the X-claim argument against religious beliefs (Law in Relig Stud, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412526000330). The argument purports to show that it is irrational to believe in the existence of extraordinary beings associated with religions. However, the X-claim argument is beset by certain ambiguities that, once resolved, leave the argument undifferentiated from two other common objections to the rationality of religious belief: the objection from religious diversity and the objection from unreliable sources. And though the latter pose serious obstacles to the rationality of religious belief, the X-claim argument adds no further difficulty. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Defeat | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Belief | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Diversity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Unreliable sources | |
| 650 | 4 | |a X-claim | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ellis, Weston |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 84(2018), 2, Seite 223-232 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:84 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:223-232 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9658-1 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 84 |j 2018 |e 2 |h 223-232 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3422869646 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1663420025 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190418114226 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190418||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||