Religiöse Erfahrung und ihre argumentativen Rollen

Religious experience is a notoriously difficult topic in the philosophy of religion. Suspicions of projection or psychological mechanisms make it difficult to integrate the phenomenon into a philosophical justification of religious beliefs. Swinburne, Plantinga, and Alston are three examples of phil...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Die epistemische Rolle religiöser Erfahrung$dOtto Muck SJ zum 80. Geburtstag
Main Author: Löffler, Winfried 1965- (Author)
Contributors: Muck, Otto 1928-2024 (Honoree)
Format: Print Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Echter 2009
In: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Year: 2009, Volume: 131, Issue: 4, Pages: 375-395
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Swinburne, Richard 1934- / Plantinga, Alvin 1932- / Alston, William P. 1921-2009 / Muck, Otto 1928-2024 / Religious experience
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
Further subjects:B Muck, Otto 1928-2024
B Festschrift
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:Religious experience is a notoriously difficult topic in the philosophy of religion. Suspicions of projection or psychological mechanisms make it difficult to integrate the phenomenon into a philosophical justification of religious beliefs. Swinburne, Plantinga, and Alston are three examples of philosophers of religion who – each in his way – try to assign religious experience a place in their defences of the rationality of religious belief. Their positions are analyzed and compared, and a common deficit is pointed out. Otto Muck's conception of »Weltanschauung« as the embedding framework of religious experience is proposed as a possible remedy.
ISSN:0044-2895
Contains:Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie