Politics of Addressing, Problems of Reception: To Whom Are Anglophone Indian Philosophers Speaking?
The demand for the recognition of non-Western philosophy has often brought about the opposition of substantialized entities such as India' and the West,' which has nourished the drifts of nationalistic rhetoric. As a decolonizing process but also as a deconstruction of nationalistic revi...
| Published in: | Sophia |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
[2018]
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2018, Volume: 57, Issue: 3, Pages: 489-500 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KBM Asia TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Post-colonial
B Political Philosophy B Contemporary Indian philosophy B Reception B Recognition |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | The demand for the recognition of non-Western philosophy has often brought about the opposition of substantialized entities such as India' and the West,' which has nourished the drifts of nationalistic rhetoric. As a decolonizing process but also as a deconstruction of nationalistic revivals, it is necessary to investigate the presuppositions involved when defining Indian philosophy' in these post-colonial demands for recognition. Considering that the understanding of what is Indian philosophy' and its claim for recognition is a prerequisite for its reception, I focus in this paper on analyzing the problems of reception of post-colonial Anglophone Indian philosophy. What is it today that prevents the reception of Anglophone Indian philosophy in Indian academics and in the global world? Leaving aside the insufficient integration in Western structures of non-Western philosophies, I focus here on the internal difficulties of Anglophone Indian philosophy in India today. I suggest that the following interrelated obstacles prevent a global reception: the language, in terms of disparity of linguistic communities; the conditions of distribution and diffusion of the philosophical material; the historical rupture in the forms of transmission of knowledge; regionalism or fragmentation into micro-groups; and finally, the complexity of the situation of utterance or enunciative context, namely, the difficulty for Indian philosophers to answer the question: to whom are we speaking? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-018-0674-5 |