Did Adultery Mandate Divorce? A Reassessment of Jesus' Divorce Logia

This paper argues that Matthew's so-called exception clauses to the prohibition of divorce (5.32; 19.9) make explicit what was already implicit in versions without them: that adultery required divorce. While biblical law required death for adulterers or expected it as a result of the ordeal of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:New Testament studies
Main Author: Loader, William R.G. 1944- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2015]
In: New Testament studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 61, Issue: 1, Pages: 67-78
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible. Matthäusevangelium 5,32 / Bible. Matthäusevangelium 19,9 / Divorce / Adultery
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
NCF Sexual ethics
Further subjects:B Divorce
B Sexual Intercourse
B Adultery
B Marriage
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1581932685
003 DE-627
005 20210701210229.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 181016s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0028688514000241  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1581932685 
035 |a (DE-576)511932685 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ511932685 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)109846907  |0 (DE-627)656805153  |0 (DE-576)166657948  |4 aut  |a Loader, William R.G.  |d 1944- 
109 |a Loader, William R.G. 1944-  |a Loader, William R. 1944-  |a Loader, Bill 1944-  |a Loader, William 1944- 
245 1 0 |a Did Adultery Mandate Divorce? A Reassessment of Jesus' Divorce Logia  |c William R. G. Loader 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper argues that Matthew's so-called exception clauses to the prohibition of divorce (5.32; 19.9) make explicit what was already implicit in versions without them: that adultery required divorce. While biblical law required death for adulterers or expected it as a result of the ordeal of the suspected wife, the issue of divorce arose where communities no longer had capital rights and where guilt was not in question. Matthew's nativity story, the norms of Greek and Roman culture, notions of the defiled wife (Deut 24.1-4) and the use of Gen 2.24 to indicate permanent joining give plausibility to the thesis. 
650 4 |a Adultery 
650 4 |a Divorce 
650 4 |a Marriage 
650 4 |a Sexual Intercourse 
652 |a HC:NCF 
689 0 0 |d u  |0 (DE-588)4427935-8  |0 (DE-627)702644099  |0 (DE-576)212339214  |a Bibel  |2 gnd  |p Matthäusevangelium  |n 5,32 
689 0 1 |d u  |0 (DE-588)4419947-8  |0 (DE-627)702634867  |0 (DE-576)212254308  |a Bibel  |2 gnd  |p Matthäusevangelium  |n 19,9 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4013656-5  |0 (DE-627)106342487  |0 (DE-576)208904956  |2 gnd  |a Ehescheidung 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4013632-2  |0 (DE-627)104419253  |0 (DE-576)208904867  |2 gnd  |a Ehebruch 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New Testament studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954  |g 61(2015), 1, Seite 67-78  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300895283  |w (DE-600)1483312-8  |w (DE-576)079165583  |x 1469-8145  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:67-78 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688514000241  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/did-adultery-mandate-divorce-a-reassessment-of-jesus-divorce-logia/A9EF47D3EA2855DAFC500F07B62E9265  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
936 u w |d 61  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 67-78 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
BIR |a 01005032_01005032,01019009_01019009  |b biblesearch 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3028846772 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1581932685 
LOK |0 005 20190131141159 
LOK |0 008 181016||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044136  |a HC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052961  |a NCF 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3942854945 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1581932685 
LOK |0 005 20210701101748 
LOK |0 008 210701||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 852 2  |b www  |9 00 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/permalink/f/1po5meu/UIB_alma51226981960003333 
LOK |0 935   |a inzs 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Adultery,Adultery,Infidelity,Adultery in art,Divorce,Divorce,Divorce 
STB 0 0 |a Adultère,Adultère,Divorce,Divorce 
STC 0 0 |a Adulterio,Adulterio,Divorcio,Divorcio,Divorcio 
STD 0 0 |a Adulterio,Adulterio,Divorzio,Divorzio 
STE 0 0 |a 离婚,离婚,通奸,通奸 
STF 0 0 |a 通姦,通姦,離婚,離婚 
STG 0 0 |a Adultério,Adultério,Divórcio,Divórcio 
STH 0 0 |a Измена,Измена,Прелюбодеяние,Прелюбодеяние (мотив),Развод (мотив),Расторжение брака 
STI 0 0 |a Διαζύγιο (μοτίβο),Διαζύγιο,Μοιχεία (μοτίβο),Μοιχεία 
SUB |a BIB 
SYG 0 0 |a Ehe,Scheidung , Seitensprung