Did Adultery Mandate Divorce? A Reassessment of Jesus' Divorce Logia
This paper argues that Matthew's so-called exception clauses to the prohibition of divorce (5.32; 19.9) make explicit what was already implicit in versions without them: that adultery required divorce. While biblical law required death for adulterers or expected it as a result of the ordeal of...
Published in: | New Testament studies |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 61, Issue: 1, Pages: 67-78 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Matthäusevangelium 5,32
/ Bible. Matthäusevangelium 19,9
/ Divorce
/ Adultery
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament NCF Sexual ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Divorce
B Sexual Intercourse B Adultery B Marriage |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1581932685 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210701210229.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 181016s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0028688514000241 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1581932685 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)511932685 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ511932685 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)109846907 |0 (DE-627)656805153 |0 (DE-576)166657948 |4 aut |a Loader, William R.G. |d 1944- | |
109 | |a Loader, William R.G. 1944- |a Loader, William R. 1944- |a Loader, Bill 1944- |a Loader, William 1944- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Did Adultery Mandate Divorce? A Reassessment of Jesus' Divorce Logia |c William R. G. Loader |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper argues that Matthew's so-called exception clauses to the prohibition of divorce (5.32; 19.9) make explicit what was already implicit in versions without them: that adultery required divorce. While biblical law required death for adulterers or expected it as a result of the ordeal of the suspected wife, the issue of divorce arose where communities no longer had capital rights and where guilt was not in question. Matthew's nativity story, the norms of Greek and Roman culture, notions of the defiled wife (Deut 24.1-4) and the use of Gen 2.24 to indicate permanent joining give plausibility to the thesis. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Adultery | |
650 | 4 | |a Divorce | |
650 | 4 | |a Marriage | |
650 | 4 | |a Sexual Intercourse | |
652 | |a HC:NCF | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4427935-8 |0 (DE-627)702644099 |0 (DE-576)212339214 |a Bibel |2 gnd |p Matthäusevangelium |n 5,32 |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4419947-8 |0 (DE-627)702634867 |0 (DE-576)212254308 |a Bibel |2 gnd |p Matthäusevangelium |n 19,9 |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4013656-5 |0 (DE-627)106342487 |0 (DE-576)208904956 |2 gnd |a Ehescheidung |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4013632-2 |0 (DE-627)104419253 |0 (DE-576)208904867 |2 gnd |a Ehebruch |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New Testament studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 |g 61(2015), 1, Seite 67-78 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300895283 |w (DE-600)1483312-8 |w (DE-576)079165583 |x 1469-8145 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:61 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:67-78 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688514000241 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/did-adultery-mandate-divorce-a-reassessment-of-jesus-divorce-logia/A9EF47D3EA2855DAFC500F07B62E9265 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a BIIN | ||
936 | u | w | |d 61 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 67-78 |
951 | |a AR | ||
BIB | |a 1 | ||
BIR | |a 01005032_01005032,01019009_01019009 |b biblesearch | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3028846772 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1581932685 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190131141159 | ||
LOK | |0 008 181016||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044136 |a HC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052961 |a NCF | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3942854945 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1581932685 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210701101748 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210701||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |m p |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 852 2 |b www |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 85640 |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/permalink/f/1po5meu/UIB_alma51226981960003333 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a inzs | ||
LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Adultery,Adultery,Infidelity,Adultery in art,Divorce,Divorce,Divorce |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Adultère,Adultère,Divorce,Divorce |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Adulterio,Adulterio,Divorcio,Divorcio,Divorcio |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Adulterio,Adulterio,Divorzio,Divorzio |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 离婚,离婚,通奸,通奸 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 通姦,通姦,離婚,離婚 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Adultério,Adultério,Divórcio,Divórcio |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Измена,Измена,Прелюбодеяние,Прелюбодеяние (мотив),Развод (мотив),Расторжение брака |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διαζύγιο (μοτίβο),Διαζύγιο,Μοιχεία (μοτίβο),Μοιχεία |
SUB | |a BIB | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Ehe,Scheidung , Seitensprung |