Il matrimonio "sine opere coniugali" tra diritto e teologia (XII-XIII secolo)
A marriage sine opere coniugali was legitimized by canon lawyers and theologians, but it was generally believed that there was no marriage without consent to carnal intercourse. This belief called into question the perfection of Mary and Joseph’s union. Therefore, the canonist Gratian posited that m...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Italiano |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2020]
|
| En: |
Quaderni di storia religiosa medievale
Año: 2020, Volumen: 23, Número: 1, Páginas: 183-206 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Sexual Intercourse
B Marriage B Nuptial Consent |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | A marriage sine opere coniugali was legitimized by canon lawyers and theologians, but it was generally believed that there was no marriage without consent to carnal intercourse. This belief called into question the perfection of Mary and Joseph’s union. Therefore, the canonist Gratian posited that marriage was begun with consent but ratified only by sexual intercourse. Hence, lawyers and theologians began to dispute the perfection of an unconsummated marriage and to discuss nuptial consent. In this discussion, the juridical concept of potestas corporis played a central role. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2785-1311 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Quaderni di storia religiosa medievale
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.32052/97583 |