Old Wine in New Bottles: Evolutionary Debunking Arguments and the Benacerraf-Field Challenge

Evolutionary debunking arguments (EDAs) purport to show that robust moral realism, the metaethical view that there are non-natural and mind-independent moral properties and facts that we can know about, is incompatible with evolutionary explanations of morality. One of the most prominent evolutionar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Klenk, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2017]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2017, Volume: 20, Issue: 4, Pages: 781-795
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCA Ethics
VA Philosophy
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Paul Benacerraf
B Moral non-naturalism
B Moral objectivity
B Evolutionary Debunking Arguments
B moral epistemology
B Sharon Street
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1565760646
003 DE-627
005 20191105100305.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171128s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-017-9797-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1565760646 
035 |a (DE-576)495760641 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ495760641 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Klenk, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Klenk, Michael 
245 1 0 |a Old Wine in New Bottles  |b Evolutionary Debunking Arguments and the Benacerraf-Field Challenge  |c Michael Klenk 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Evolutionary debunking arguments (EDAs) purport to show that robust moral realism, the metaethical view that there are non-natural and mind-independent moral properties and facts that we can know about, is incompatible with evolutionary explanations of morality. One of the most prominent evolutionary debunking arguments is advanced by Sharon Street, who argues that if moral realism were true, then objective moral knowledge is unlikely because realist moral properties are evolutionary irrelevant and moral beliefs about those properties would not be selected for. However, no evolutionary, causal explanation plays an essential role in reaching the argument’s epistemological conclusion. Street’s argument depends on the Benacerraf-Field challenge, which is the challenge to explain the reliability of our moral beliefs about causally inert moral properties. The Benacerraf-Field challenge relies on metaphysically necessary facts about realist moral properties, rather than on contingent Darwinian facts about the origin of our moral beliefs. Attempting to include an essential causal empirical premise yet avoiding recourse to the Benacerraf-Field problem yields an argument that is either self-defeating or of limited scope. Ultimately, evolutionary, causal explanations of our moral beliefs and their consequences do not present the strongest case against robust moral realism. Rather, the question is whether knowledge of casually-inert, mind-intendent properties is plausible at all. 
601 |a Argumentation 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a Evolutionary Debunking Arguments 
650 4 |a moral epistemology 
650 4 |a Moral non-naturalism 
650 4 |a Moral objectivity 
650 4 |a Paul Benacerraf 
650 4 |a Sharon Street 
652 |a NBE:NCA:VA:VB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 20(2017), 4, Seite 781-795  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g pages:781-795 
856 |u https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/348438/Klenk_2017_Old_Wine_in_New_Bottles.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-017-9797-y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9797-y  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 20  |j 2017  |e 4  |h 781-795 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2988334102 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1565760646 
LOK |0 005 20191105100305 
LOK |0 008 171128||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL