Civil marriage, same-sex couples, and religious freedom: reflections from a U.S. scholar-activist
In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in f...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electronic/Print Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
En: |
Theology & sexuality
Año: 2017, Volumen: 23, Número: 3, Páginas: 249-254 |
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo
/ Igualdad de género
/ Discriminación
|
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | CH Cristianismo y sociedad NCF Ética sexual |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Discrimination
B and conscience claims B the public role of religion B Same-sex marriage B Religious Liberty B Marriage |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (doi) |
Parallel Edition: | Electrónico
|
Sumario: | In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in favor of marriage equality rather than one based on a liberal rights framework, and (2) given the religiously based opposition to marriage equality, how to critique their discriminatory claims without deprecating religion itself? |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1355-8358 |
Reference: | Kritik von "“Equal rites before the law” (2017)"
Kritik von "Conscientious objectors and the marrying kind (2017)" Kritik von "Rings for the rainbow family (2017)" |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1351127 |