Civil marriage, same-sex couples, and religious freedom: reflections from a U.S. scholar-activist
In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in f...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Theology & sexuality
Year: 2017, Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 249-254 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Same-sex marriage
/ Equal rights (motif)
/ Discrimination
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CH Christianity and Society NCF Sexual ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Discrimination
B and conscience claims B the public role of religion B Same-sex marriage B Religious Liberty B Marriage |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in favor of marriage equality rather than one based on a liberal rights framework, and (2) given the religiously based opposition to marriage equality, how to critique their discriminatory claims without deprecating religion itself? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1355-8358 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "“Equal rites before the law” (2017)"
Kritik von "Conscientious objectors and the marrying kind (2017)" Kritik von "Rings for the rainbow family (2017)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1351127 |