On the Standards-Variantist Solution to Skepticism

The skeptical puzzle consists of three independently plausible yet jointly inconsistent claims: (A) S knows a certain ordinary proposition op; (B) S does not know the denial of a certain skeptical hypothesis sh; and (C) S knows that op only if S knows that not-sh. The variantist solution (to the ske...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lee, Kok Yong (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2017
Em: International journal for the study of skepticism
Ano: 2017, Volume: 7, Número: 3, Páginas: 173-198
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Ceticismo / Lógica epistêmica
Outras palavras-chave:B epistemic contextualism standards variantism position variantism skepticism pragmatic penetration intellectualism
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Publisher)
Descrição
Resumo:The skeptical puzzle consists of three independently plausible yet jointly inconsistent claims: (A) S knows a certain ordinary proposition op; (B) S does not know the denial of a certain skeptical hypothesis sh; and (C) S knows that op only if S knows that not-sh. The variantist solution (to the skeptical puzzle) claims that (A) and not-(B) are true in the ordinary context, but false in the skeptical one. Epistemic contextualism has offered a standards-variantist solution, which is the most prominent variantist solution on the market. In this paper, I argue that the standards-variantist solution in general (and the contextualist solution in particular) is epistemically uninteresting. Proponents of the variantist solution should opt for the position-variantist solution instead. I will discuss some important implications of my findings.
Descrição Física:Online-Ressource
ISSN:2210-5700
Obras secundárias:In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00001224