La ponctuation samaritaine et le Pentateuque samaritain de Fribourg

This article compares the list of punctuation signs of Samaritan manuscript F, folio 265r, with the lists of manuscripts R1 and P2. The lists are then compared with the text of those manuscripts. This study shows that the same names are used in the lists, they do not always designate the same signs....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Himbaza, Innocent 1965- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:French
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2022
In: Semitica
Year: 2022, Volume: 64, Pages: 209-230
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article compares the list of punctuation signs of Samaritan manuscript F, folio 265r, with the lists of manuscripts R1 and P2. The lists are then compared with the text of those manuscripts. This study shows that the same names are used in the lists, they do not always designate the same signs. It also shows that the manuscript uses signs that are absent from the list, and that their use does not match the meaning of their names. Scribes thus had various interpretations of the same signs, and it is not possible to harmonize medieval Samaritan punctuation. An edition of the Samaritan Pentateuch featuring punctuation will therefore have to choose and follow one of the existing systems.
ISSN:2466-6815
Contains:Enthalten in: Semitica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/SE.64.0.3291274