"Uważam się za heretyka i za gnostyka, i szczycę się, że nim jestem": Jerzego Prokopiuka ezoteryczna recepcja gnozy i gnostycyzmu

In the paper, the author presents Jerzy Prokopiuk's (1931-2021) outlook on gnosis and Gnosticism. Prokopiuk was a Polish esotericist, translator, and non-academic specialist in religious studies. His views on this subject can be divided into four areas: (1) definition of gnosis; (2) the essence...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dobkowski, Mariusz (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Polish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wydawn. Uniw. Jagiellońskiego 2021
In: Studia religiologica
Year: 2021, Volume: 54, Issue: 3, Pages: 269-284
Further subjects:B gnoza
B ezoteryzm polski
B esoteric tradition
B gnostycyzm
B tradycja ezoteryczna
B Gnosticism
B Polish esotericism
B Jerzy Prokopiuk
B Gnosis
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In the paper, the author presents Jerzy Prokopiuk's (1931-2021) outlook on gnosis and Gnosticism. Prokopiuk was a Polish esotericist, translator, and non-academic specialist in religious studies. His views on this subject can be divided into four areas: (1) definition of gnosis; (2) the essence and description of Gnosticism as a historical religious formation; (3) description and understanding of the post-Gnostic tradition; (4) gnosis and Gnosticism as a hermeneutic tool. As to (1) definition of gnosis, the Prokopiuk presents three forms of this special kind of knowledge: escapist gnosis (know- ledge liberates the human spirit from material body and the physical world); transformational gnosis (knowledge transforms the human soul, body and earthly nature); lateral gnosis (idea of alternative worlds). Regarding (2) Gnosticism, Prokopiuk says that its source was ancient mysteries and a par- ticular type of religious experience. He sees (3) the post-Gnostic tradition as an unbroken chain of esoteric groups and figures from late antiquity to the present day. Finally, gnosis and Gnosticism are (4) a hermeneutic tool for Prokopiuk because they allow him to interpret phenomena and texts of culture (in the field of literature, cinema, psychology, and others). The paper also reflects on the usefulness of some of Prokopiuk's ideas for contemporary humanities.
ISSN:2084-4077
Contains:Enthalten in: Studia religiologica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.4467/20844077SR.21.017.16554