[Rezension von: Shrubsole, Nicholas, 1981-, What has no place, remains]

Nicholas Shrubsole’s What Has No Place, Remains is an important contribution to the discussion of Indigenous religious freedom in Canada. Shrubsole provides a thorough and compelling analysis of how the Canadian Constitution’s multiple apparent promises to Indigenous Peoples have often gone unfulfil...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kislowicz, Howard (Author)
Contributors: Shrubsole, Nicholas 1981- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2021
In: A journal of church and state
Year: 2021, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 342-344
Review of:What has no place, remains (Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 2019) (Kislowicz, Howard)
What Has No Place, Remains (Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 2019) (Kislowicz, Howard)
What Has No Place, Remains (Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 2019) (Kislowicz, Howard)
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Indigenous peoples / Religious freedom / Colonialism / Canada
IxTheo Classification:KBQ North America
SA Church law; state-church law
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Nicholas Shrubsole’s What Has No Place, Remains is an important contribution to the discussion of Indigenous religious freedom in Canada. Shrubsole provides a thorough and compelling analysis of how the Canadian Constitution’s multiple apparent promises to Indigenous Peoples have often gone unfulfilled.Shrubsole’s book brings together the various ways in which Indigenous groups have sought to have their religious practices protected in Canada, and the different difficulties associated with each. In 1982, Canada’s Constitution was amended to protect “freedom of conscience and religion” and “recognize and affirm” the “existing aboriginal and treaty rights of the aboriginal peoples.” Both provisions offer hope for constitutional protection from legislative and executive infringements, but have so far proven disappointing to advocates of Indigenous Peoples’ religious freedom.
ISSN:2040-4867
Contains:Enthalten in: A journal of church and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jcs/csab022