A Cognitive Science Analysis of the Quaker Business Method: Is How It Works Why It Works?
The Quaker Business Method (QBM) has been in development for over 300 years. Quakers believe that the QBM is an effective means for making decisions. This paper develops a tripartite theoretical framework to analyse the QBM in order to examine its efficacy, in terms of both the quality of its proces...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Liverpool University Press
[2019]
|
| In: |
Quaker studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 271-297 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KDG Free church NCE Business ethics NCJ Ethics of science |
| Further subjects: | B
Quaker Business Method
B Cognitive processes B meeting for business B decision-making tools B moral relational models B Scientific Explanation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The Quaker Business Method (QBM) has been in development for over 300 years. Quakers believe that the QBM is an effective means for making decisions. This paper develops a tripartite theoretical framework to analyse the QBM in order to examine its efficacy, in terms of both the quality of its processes and the morality of its decisions. The framework encompasses: (1) a decomposition of the QBM as a set of tools; (2) a selection of theories and models from Cognitive Science that explain how humans think; (3) a set of relational models that can be used to objectively judge the morality of different forms of human behavioural interactions. Overall, it appears that QBM tools may counter the deficits in natural human abilities to reason and solve problems, that they may promote decision-making practices that are moral and that the resulting decisions, themselves, may be moral. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2397-1770 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Quaker studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3828/quaker.2019.24.2.6 |