The body in question: metaphor and meaning in the interpretation of Ephesians 5:21-33

This study is an analysis of the argumentation of Ephesians 5:21-33. The interpretation of this passage remains fiercely contested: while some interpreters appeal to this text to suggest that husbands have authority over their wives, others reject its apparently patriarchal ethic. Approaching Ephesi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dawes, Gregory W. (Author)
Format: Print Book
Language:English
Subito Delivery Service: Order now.
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
WorldCat: WorldCat
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Leiden [u.a.] Brill 1998
In: Biblical interpretation series (30)
Year: 1998
Reviews:, in: RBLit 3 (2001) 460-463 (Parker, David M.)
, in: JBL 121 (2002) 378-380 (Yorke, Gosnell L.O.R.)
DAWES, Gregory W., Body in Question: Metaphor and Meaning in the Interpreta tion of Ephesians 5.21-33 (Biblical Interpretation Series, 30; Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1998), pp. xiv + 264. NLG145.00/US85.50. ISBN 90-04-10959-5 (1999)
The Body in Question. Metaphor and Meaning in the Interpretation of Ephesians 5:21-33 (1999) (Sellin, Gerhard, 1943 - 2017)
Series/Journal:Biblical interpretation series 30
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible. Epheserbrief 5,21-33 / Exegesis
B Bible. Epheserbrief 5,21-33 / Body / Metaphor
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
Further subjects:B Ephesians
B Metaphor
B Bible. Epheserbrief 5,21-33
Description
Summary:This study is an analysis of the argumentation of Ephesians 5:21-33. The interpretation of this passage remains fiercely contested: while some interpreters appeal to this text to suggest that husbands have authority over their wives, others reject its apparently patriarchal ethic. Approaching Ephesians 5:21-33 by way of a discussion of metaphorical language, the present work shows that its argumentation rests upon two very different uses of the 'body' metaphor. One use highlights the unity of wife and husband, while the other underlines the distinction between the partners and suggests that the husband has a position of authority. The tension created by these two uses of the 'body' metaphor implies that neither a simple hierarchical nor a simple egalitarian interpretation of the passage can be justified.
Item Description:Literaturverz. S. [251] - 259
ISBN:9004109595