Common good dynamics in Copanatoyac: development process indicators in a rural, indigenous municipality of Mexico

The aim of the article is to understand how common good dynamics shape the rural, mainly indigenous municipality of Copanatoyac in Guerrero, Mexico. Based on the data collected in 2022 by the ipbc (Instituto Promotor del Bien Común) research team, we use the common good approach to development to of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:A common good approach to development in indigenous communities
Authors: Nebel, Mathias 1971- (Author) ; Aranda, Juan Pablo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Journal of global ethics
Year: 2025, Volume: 21, Issue: 3, Pages: 314-334
Further subjects:B Common Good
B Development
B social processes
B Copanatoyac
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The aim of the article is to understand how common good dynamics shape the rural, mainly indigenous municipality of Copanatoyac in Guerrero, Mexico. Based on the data collected in 2022 by the ipbc (Instituto Promotor del Bien Común) research team, we use the common good approach to development to offer a narrative of the municipality’s trends on governance, justice, stability, collective agency, and humanity. After a brief introduction on how a common good approach can help interpret key social processes and development trends, the first part concentrates on what the data shows about the five main triggers of common good dynamics. The second part investigates how Basic Common Goods (bcg) are created, distributed, and governed in the municipality. Our main results are (a) that the modern state and its institutions are not only failing to promote local common good dynamics but are in fact a hindrance to the common good; and (b) that while collective agency to address and solve common problems is high, it reaches its limit in two key domains: the ability to earn enough to live well, and systemic humiliation and injustice.
ISSN:1744-9634
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of global ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2025.2590219