Arendt y Santo Tomás : mal, ignorancia e irreflexión
This article aims to describe the Hannah Arendt´s thesis of “banality of evil”, that she proposed after Adolf Eichmann´s trial, and compare it with the doctrine of Saint Thomas Aquinas about the causality of moral evil –especially from an anthropologic-psychologic point of view–, as he develops it i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2018
|
| In: |
Sapientia
Year: 2018, Volume: 74, Issue: 244, Pages: 51-111 |
| Further subjects: | B
Arendt, Hannah, 1906-1975
B Filosofia Contemporanea B Mal B Ignorancia B Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274 B Filosofia Politica |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This article aims to describe the Hannah Arendt´s thesis of “banality of evil”, that she proposed after Adolf Eichmann´s trial, and compare it with the doctrine of Saint Thomas Aquinas about the causality of moral evil –especially from an anthropologic-psychologic point of view–, as he develops it in Summa Theologiae. After exposing the main thesis of both authors, we seek to mark some common grounds, their differences and the possible mutual enrichment between them. El propósito de nuestro artículo es describir la tesis de la “banalidad del mal” de Hannah Arendt, que ella planteara tras el juicio a Adolf Eichmann, y compararla con la doctrina de Santo Tomás de Aquino sobre la causalidad del mal moral, especialmente desde el punto de vista antropológicopsicológico, tal como este la trata en la Suma Teológica. Tras exponer las tesis centrales de ambos pensadores, se señalan algunos posibles puntos de contacto, sus diferencias y los aspectos en que pudieran ser dos planteos mutuamente enriquecedores, especialmente para la cultura contemporánea. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sapientia
|
