Merleau-Ponty : de la ambigüedad a la hiperdialéctica
The analysis of Merleau-Ponty’s thought, from his phenomenology of perception through his posthumous work, reveals that the author maintained his basic initial position unmodified. The ambiguity of sensitive perception, which worked as a critical element against empiricism and rationalism, evolves i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2008
|
| In: |
Sapientia
Year: 2008, Volume: 64, Issue: 224, Pages: 36-50 |
| Further subjects: | B
Percepcion
B Dialectica B Corporeidad B Fenomenologia B Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 1908-1961 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The analysis of Merleau-Ponty’s thought, from his phenomenology of perception through his posthumous work, reveals that the author maintained his basic initial position unmodified. The ambiguity of sensitive perception, which worked as a critical element against empiricism and rationalism, evolves into a dialectical –hyperdialectical, in the author’s terms– in which subject and world are only dialectical moments of a unique reality called flesh. The article makes clear that such metaphysics is in no way required by the phenomenology of perception, but answers to an independent option. At the same time, it underlines several flaws both in the phenomenology of ambiguity and in hyperdialectics. El análisis del pensamiento de Merleau-Ponty, desde su fenomenología de la percepción hasta su obra póstuma, revela que el autor mantuvo inmodificada su posición inicial básica. La ambigüedad de la percepción sensitiva, que había servido de elemento crítico frente al empirismo y al racionalismo, se transforma en una ontología dialéctica –hiperdialéctica, en los términos del autor– en la que sujeto y mundo son sólo momentos dialécticos de una única realidad llamada carne. Se pone de manifiesto que dicha metafísica no está exigida de ningún modo por la fenomenología de la percepción, sino que responde a una opción independiente. A su vez, se subrayan diversas inconsistencias tanto de la fenomenología de la ambigüedad como de la hiperdialéctica. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sapientia
|
