On the Axiology of Theism: Reply to Klaas J. Kraay
In "Method and Madness in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion" Klaas Kraay offers some methodological considerations that lead to a taxonomy and a larger research project for an axiology of theism. This reply identifies some crucial vagueness and ambiguity in the taxonomy and proj...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2013
|
| In: |
Toronto journal of theology
Year: 2013, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 271-276 |
| Further subjects: | B
Axiology
B Theism B Methodology B Semantics B Values |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | In "Method and Madness in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion" Klaas Kraay offers some methodological considerations that lead to a taxonomy and a larger research project for an axiology of theism. This reply identifies some crucial vagueness and ambiguity in the taxonomy and project, and makes three constructive recommendations for improving the project. It also illustrates how the removal of ambiguity can enable the project to proceed in a straightforward and compelling manner. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1918-6371 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Toronto journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3138/tjt.2093 |
