Abortion Access Persists, but So Do the Threats

“Shield laws” declare that, for purposes of reproductive health care, the law of the jurisdiction in which the clinician practices governs when state laws conflict. In 2024, approximately 100,000 pregnant people living in states that criminalize abortion provision received pills for a medication abo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Watson, Katie (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2026
In: The Hastings Center report
Jahr: 2026, Band: 56, Heft: 1, Seiten: 5
weitere Schlagwörter:B medication abortion
B reproductive ethics
B telemedicine
B right to travel
B shield laws
B state abortion laws
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1951312791
003 DE-627
005 20260206055505.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260206s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.70043  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1951312791 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1951312791 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Watson, Katie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Abortion Access Persists, but So Do the Threats 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a “Shield laws” declare that, for purposes of reproductive health care, the law of the jurisdiction in which the clinician practices governs when state laws conflict. In 2024, approximately 100,000 pregnant people living in states that criminalize abortion provision received pills for a medication abortion from a clinician living in one of the eight states with these laws. One of these clinicians is New York's Margaret Carpenter, who was criminally charged in Louisiana and fined and enjoined in Texas. Carpenter's case testing shield laws, which is likely to go to the U.S. Supreme Court, should be framed as a “right to travel case” because telemedicine should be understood as a modern version of travel. If the Supreme Court ultimately accepts Louisiana and Texas's likely argument that it's a narrow “state regulation of medicine” case, the Court will be limiting the constitutional right to travel to people who have the money and time to physically travel for medical care, and withholding it from people who need the same care but who can afford to access it only through virtual travel. 
650 4 |a reproductive ethics 
650 4 |a telemedicine 
650 4 |a medication abortion 
650 4 |a right to travel 
650 4 |a state abortion laws 
650 4 |a shield laws 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 56(2026), 1, Seite 5  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:56  |g year:2026  |g number:1  |g pages:5 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/hast.70043  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.70043  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.70043  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4877587640 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1951312791 
LOK |0 005 20260206055505 
LOK |0 008 260206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-02-05#569058F528B909D677191A11016110E06C9D50AB 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
LOK |0 939   |a 06-02-26  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw