Abortion Access Persists, but So Do the Threats

“Shield laws” declare that, for purposes of reproductive health care, the law of the jurisdiction in which the clinician practices governs when state laws conflict. In 2024, approximately 100,000 pregnant people living in states that criminalize abortion provision received pills for a medication abo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Watson, Katie (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2026
In: The Hastings Center report
Year: 2026, Volume: 56, Issue: 1, Pages: 5
Further subjects:B medication abortion
B reproductive ethics
B telemedicine
B right to travel
B shield laws
B state abortion laws
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:“Shield laws” declare that, for purposes of reproductive health care, the law of the jurisdiction in which the clinician practices governs when state laws conflict. In 2024, approximately 100,000 pregnant people living in states that criminalize abortion provision received pills for a medication abortion from a clinician living in one of the eight states with these laws. One of these clinicians is New York's Margaret Carpenter, who was criminally charged in Louisiana and fined and enjoined in Texas. Carpenter's case testing shield laws, which is likely to go to the U.S. Supreme Court, should be framed as a “right to travel case” because telemedicine should be understood as a modern version of travel. If the Supreme Court ultimately accepts Louisiana and Texas's likely argument that it's a narrow “state regulation of medicine” case, the Court will be limiting the constitutional right to travel to people who have the money and time to physically travel for medical care, and withholding it from people who need the same care but who can afford to access it only through virtual travel.
ISSN:1552-146X
Contains:Enthalten in: Hastings Center, The Hastings Center report
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1002/hast.70043