Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology Insights into the Classical Theological Debate about Free Will and Responsibility

In recent years significant advances have occurred in both fields of neuroscience and cognitive psychology which have provided further comprehension regarding the biological structures underlying intentionality and decision making. In this essay, Tobias A. Mattei reviews the insights such empirical...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mattei, Tobias Alecio (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Christian scholar's review
Year: 2013, Volume: 42, Issue: 2, Pages: 123-147
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1948959283
003 DE-627
005 20260115145341.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260115s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1948959283 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1948959283 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mattei, Tobias Alecio  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology Insights into the Classical Theological Debate about Free Will and Responsibility 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In recent years significant advances have occurred in both fields of neuroscience and cognitive psychology which have provided further comprehension regarding the biological structures underlying intentionality and decision making. In this essay, Tobias A. Mattei reviews the insights such empirical data might provide to the classical theological debate about human will and responsibility. After analyzing the positions of John Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, Martin Luther, and the Westminster Confession of Faith, Mattei exposes how all of them involved a view of human will as “self-determined” and “corrupted.” His discussion then considers how empirical data strongly supports the view of “free will” as a complex and elaborated “illusion” of human mind. Such findings are in agreement with the previously discussed reformed perspective of a compatibilistic view of human will, which is essentially deterministic, but not reducible to the biochemical and neurophysiological levels. 
601 |a Psychologie 
601 |a Theologe 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Christian scholar's review  |d Wenham, Mass. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1970  |g 42(2013), 2, Seite 123-147  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)630363145  |w (DE-600)2560675-X  |w (DE-576)339261773  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:123-147 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1633183580  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://christianscholars.com/neuroscience-and-cognitive-psychology-insights-into-the-classical-theological-debate-about-free-will-and-responsibility/  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4849842801 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1948959283 
LOK |0 005 20260115144908 
LOK |0 008 260115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 15-01-26  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw