The homoousios as a lasting benchmark for Christology

The term homoousios stands as a cornerstone of the Nicene Creed. In churches where the Nicene Creed is recited liturgically, the shared essence of Father and Son forms an integral tenet of faith. Yet, this very term is often rejected or reinterpreted within modern Christology, viewed as quintessenti...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Wisse, Maarten 1973- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2025
Dans: International journal of philosophy and theology
Année: 2025, Volume: 86, Numéro: 2/4, Pages: 161-178
Sujets non-standardisés:B Ontology
B Christology
B Nicea
B Metaphysics
B Dalferth
B homoousios
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The term homoousios stands as a cornerstone of the Nicene Creed. In churches where the Nicene Creed is recited liturgically, the shared essence of Father and Son forms an integral tenet of faith. Yet, this very term is often rejected or reinterpreted within modern Christology, viewed as quintessentially a product of the Greco-Roman context surrounding early Christian confession. It has become conventional to link homoousios with the substance metaphysics characteristic of pre-Enlightenment (pre-1750) philosophy and theology. Since then, relational thinking has increasingly been considered a more adequate way to express the divinity of Jesus than this Hellenistic import. This contribution will first outline the contemporary critique of substance metaphysics and its application to Christology. It will then offer a defense of homoousios through engagement with Ingolf Dalferth’s relational Christology. Finally, it will explore the implications of employing both Christological models for spirituality and liturgy.
ISSN:2169-2335
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2025.2537626