"Trouw ook aan de aarde": Miskotte en de natuur als schepping
Ecofeminist theology appears to be in opposition to the theology of K. H. Miskotte. Miskotte opposed natural theology and approached creation from a soteriological standpoint. In his footsteps, nature and creation became suspicious categories in theology. However, Miskotte is also known for his love...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Dutch |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Kerk en theologie
Year: 2025, Volume: 76, Issue: 4, Pages: 475-492 |
| Further subjects: | B
Incarnation
B Miskotte B ecofeminist theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Ecofeminist theology appears to be in opposition to the theology of K. H. Miskotte. Miskotte opposed natural theology and approached creation from a soteriological standpoint. In his footsteps, nature and creation became suspicious categories in theology. However, Miskotte is also known for his love of nature, especially the woods, as testified in his published diaries. Might Miskotte's love of nature and his thinking on creation contribute constructively to ecofeminist thinking? In this article, the idea is contested that Miskotte's love for nature was just a juvenile, romantic phase, and two starting points are proposed on how Miskotte's thinking could contribute to ecofeminist theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2773-1847 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Kerk en theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/KT2025.4.004.DAHM |
