Die invloed van In eie werklikheidsverstaan op die verstaan van die opstandingsgebeure: In Vergelykende studie

Worldview and resurrection: A comparative study. This article deals with the relationship between a theologian's world view and his or her view of the resurrection of Christ. The theologies of Barth, Bultmann, Pannenberg and Moltmann are compared. Their views on Scripture and revelation are com...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Steenekamp, Nicolaas J. S. (Author) ; Koekemoer, J. H. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 1996
In: Hervormde teologiese studies
Year: 1996, Volume: 52, Issue: 2/3, Pages: 395-414
Further subjects:B Philosophers
B Theology
B Practical Theology
B Ministers of Religion
B Ancient Semitic and Classical Languages
B Aspects of Religious Studies
B Theologians
B Netherdutch Reformed Church
B Scholars
B Sociology and Ethics
B Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Worldview and resurrection: A comparative study. This article deals with the relationship between a theologian's world view and his or her view of the resurrection of Christ. The theologies of Barth, Bultmann, Pannenberg and Moltmann are compared. Their views on Scripture and revelation are compared to discover the influence of historical criticism on their different views. These views are studied to see how they contribute to clarifing their respective positions on the resurrection of Christ.
ISSN:0259-9422
Contains:Enthalten in: Hervormde teologiese studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.4102/hts.v52i2/3.1519