Jeremiah 10:1–16 MT and LXX: Interpretive Challenges and Possibilities

The relationship between Jer 10:1–16MT and LXX has been typically investigated through textual and redaction criticism. The impact of an oral mindset—i.e., memorization, oral performance, and transmission—on the written text remained marginal to the debate if not neglected. The article suggests that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rossi, Benedetta 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Vetus Testamentum
Year: 2025, Volume: 75, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 688-710
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible. Jeremia 10,1-16 / Old Testament / Old Testament / Textual criticism / Redaktionsgeschichtliche Schule
Further subjects:B Textual Criticism
B memory variants
B Jeremiah
B Vetus Latina
B Septuagint
B Orality
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The relationship between Jer 10:1–16MT and LXX has been typically investigated through textual and redaction criticism. The impact of an oral mindset—i.e., memorization, oral performance, and transmission—on the written text remained marginal to the debate if not neglected. The article suggests that the interplay between the “oral world” and “written word” provides clues for understanding the textual conundrum of Jer 10:1–16 and offers valuable insights to reconsider the relation between JerMT and LXX. Specific patterns of textual variants (e.g., synonymous readings, additions providing specificity, and word order shift) show the extent to which the scribes’ oral mindset affected the transmission of Jer 10:1–16. The widespread reception of the text also points to Jer 10:1–16 as an example of long-duration literature.
ISSN:1568-5330
Contains:Enthalten in: Vetus Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685330-bja10188